What CORA needs the ID19 team to confirm before the model can be trusted.
ID19 was reverse-engineered from the beamline's own public BLISS Beacon device database (gitlab.esrf.fr/id19/beamline_configuration), so the control handles in the Inventory are the beamline's real BLISS object and Tango device names, read from the config rather than confirmed by staff. Each row below is a fact the beamline team owns, not a CORA modelling choice (those are on Model). It is a delete-on-answer queue. Priorities are Blocks-build, Blocks-go-live, and Nice-to-have.
The hutch grouping: one optics hutch and one experiment hutch holding both endstations, or a finer split?
One id19-optics and one id19-experiment enclosure.
The Enclosure grouping.
ENDSTATION-1
Nice-to-have
The further endstations in the config (MH, MED, laminography LATOMO, RADIO, PCOTOMO, the SmarAct towers, the fluorescence MCAs): are they distinct endstations CORA should model?
Noted, not modelled in this cut; MR and HR are the two main tomography stations.