What CORA needs the HEX team to confirm before the model can be trusted.
HEX was reverse-engineered from public sources (the BNL beamline page, the beamline 27-ID wiki, and the beamline's bluesky profile collection NSLS2/hex-profile-collection and NSLS2/hextools), so the control handles in the Inventory are read from public config rather than confirmed by staff. Each row below is a fact the beamline team owns, not a CORA modelling choice (those are on Model). It is a delete-on-answer queue. Priorities are Blocks-build, Blocks-go-live, and Nice-to-have.
Are the six designed enclosures A (FOE), B, C, D, E, F, with only A and F presently relevant to operations (B not erected; C / D / E future-upgrade shells)?
All six declared; hex-foe and hex-endstation carry devices, B to E are device-free forward-looking shells.
The Enclosure grouping and the future-hutch contents.
SAT-1
Nice-to-have
Is the satellite building housing the F-hutch the same as Bldg. 742 or a separate numbered structure adjacent to it?
The F-hutch is a distinct enclosure adjacent to Bldg. 742, bound to the NSLS-II Site.
The endstation Enclosure detail.
LAYOUT-1
Nice-to-have
The source-to-F-hutch distance (about 100 m) and whether an exact per-hutch z-position table exists.
About 100 m source to endstation; no per-hutch z table carried.
The beam-path geometry.
BRANCH-1
Nice-to-have
Do the inboard and outboard front-end branches carry any installed optics, or are they bare provisions for the future hutches?
Provisions only; only the center branch carries devices.
The modular sample-tower configurations (A to D), the 500 kg capacity, and which axes are motorized (the tomographic rotation and the translations).
One reconfigurable tower (Table, 500 kg, configs A to D) plus a RotaryStage rotation and LinearStage translations; capacity and config set as settings.
The sample-stage modelling.
INSITU-1
Blocks-go-live
Which in-situ rigs are actually installed or available at the endstation (load frames, furnaces, cryostats, battery cyclers)?
None installed; the endstation is "capable of housing" user-brought environments, so no in-situ rig is modelled.
The sample-environment modelling; the CORA family decision is on Model.
The PerkinElmer area-detector model (XRD1621?), its pixel count, and that it is the angle-dispersive / powder-diffraction (ADXD) detector.
A PerkinElmer XRD1621 flat panel binding Camera, inferred to be the ADXD detector.
The area-detector modelling.
DET-2
Blocks-go-live
The GeRM germanium strip detector channel count, energy resolution, and the EDXD gauge-volume dimensions.
A GeRM strip detector binding the existing EnergyDispersiveSpectrometer Family; specs pending.
The energy-dispersive-detector modelling.
DET-3
Nice-to-have
Which Kinetix camera is the tomography default, and the scintillator / lens magnification options behind the "2 & 4 mm", "20 & 40 mm", and "Dual cam" imaging-table positions.
kinetix1 is the default; the scintillator-lens table binds Scintillator; the Phantom Veo is the high-speed camera.
Are the EPICS PV handles read from the profile collection current and correct, and what are the FOE-optics PVs (absent from it)?
The endstation detector handles are from the profile collection and carried confirm; the FOE-optics PVs are pending.
Verifying each Asset's control handle.
PSS-1
Blocks-go-live
The PSS search-and-secure permit signals and the photon / front-end shutters (absent from the profile collection).
Permit leaves and shutters to be named; not invented here.
The Enclosure permit signals and the safety tier.
SUP-1
Nice-to-have
The vacuum extent (the FOE optics) and the cooling supply.
Photon beam, cooling water, and vacuum on the FOE optics; the cryogen-free wiggler draws no liquid helium.
The Supply observations.
GOV-1
Nice-to-have
The NSLS-II operator pool and safety-review structure (site-level), and the NYSERDA-aligned beamtime-reservation fraction and the proposal-evaluation committee's scoring split.
Carried pending on the NSLS-II Site; the NYSERDA allocation Policy layered on top, fraction and scoring pending.
Is the operational technique set exactly imaging / tomography, radiography, EDXD, and powder / ADXD, with all three diffraction-and-imaging modes available in the one endstation, and are PDF and 3DXRD not offered?
Those techniques only; multi-technique in one endstation via detector / optics positioning; no PDF, no 3DXRD.
The technique Capabilities and the multi-technique modelling.