Skip to content

Open questions

What CORA needs the HXN team to confirm. This model is reverse-engineered from public open source (the NSLS2/hxn-profile-collection profile collection): the EPICS PVs are read from it, but vendor identities, physical positions, and the detector roster are not. Each row is a fact the beamline team owns. It is a delete-on-answer queue.

Priorities: Blocks-build (changes the model structure), Blocks-go-live (needed before CORA controls or observes the hardware), Nice-to-have.

Source and safety

ID Priority Question CORA assumes Resolves
SRC-1 Nice-to-have IVU20 undulator period, gap range, and harmonic usage. The device (SR:C3-ID:G1{IVU20:1}) is confirmed; parameters are not in source. An in-vacuum undulator, identity-only. The InsertionDevice settings.
PSS-1 Blocks-go-live The PSS search-and-secure permit-leaf PVs per hutch. Only the photon shutter XF:03IDB-PPS{PSh} is in source. The permit signal is a confirm note, not a guessed PV. The Enclosure permit signals.
ENC-1 Nice-to-have Is the XF:03IDB intermediate zone (secondary-source aperture, slow shutter) a distinct enclosure, or part of the endstation? HXN spans three PV zones (3-ID-A/B/C). Two enclosures (3-ID-A optics, 3-ID-C experiment); 3-ID-B folded. The Enclosure set and roles.

Optics

ID Priority Question CORA assumes Resolves
DCM-1 Nice-to-have DCM crystal cut and energy range. A double-crystal monochromator; cut/range blank. The Monochromator settings.
OPTIC-1 Blocks-go-live Are the zone plate and the multilayer Laue lens both permanently installed and operator-selected, or is one decommissioned? Both appear in source. Both modelled, switchable. The focusing-optic roster.
OPTIC-2 Nice-to-have Zone-plate parameters (outer-zone width, diameter, material). A ZonePlate Asset, parameters blank. The ZonePlate settings.
OPTIC-3 Nice-to-have Should MultilayerLaueLens become a catalog Family? HXN is its only sighting (a 1D crossed-pair lens, distinct from the circular ZonePlate). A loose family name that renders as text; not yet graduated. Catalog Family graduation (Federation-scoped).

Sample and detectors

ID Priority Question CORA assumes Resolves
STAGE-1 Blocks-go-live The tomographic rotary (sth, on an ANC350) hardware, encoder resolution, and max speed. A RotaryStage, specs blank. The SampleRotary settings.
STAGE-2 Nice-to-have Does the SmarAct Smarpod 6-DOF pod fit the Hexapod Family (single coordinated parallel-kinematics move)? Modelled as a Hexapod. The SamplePod Family fit.
DET-1 Blocks-go-live The Xspress3 fluorescence detector: vendor (Quantum Detectors?), element count, energy resolution. Source shows 4 channels (C1-C4) plus a second unit. One EnergyDispersiveSpectrometer Asset presenting the Sensor Role; specs blank. The detector Model and element count.
CAM-1 Blocks-go-live Which pixel detectors are physically installed and active? Source has Merlin (x2), Eiger 1M, and Dexela; some classes are duplicated (USE_RASMI-gated). Merlin1, Eiger1, Dexela1 modelled as Cameras; dormant duplicates excluded. The detector roster and the per-scan detector slot.
DIAG-1 Nice-to-have The scaler / ion-chamber flux channel map (which channel is I0 for ptycho normalization). Read-only flux counters, channel map blank. The FluxCounter bindings.

Controls and techniques

ID Priority Question CORA assumes Resolves
DRIVE-1 Blocks-go-live The motion-controller box models, firmware, serials, and IPs. HXN exposes the controller PVs (Power PMAC Ppmac:1 + MC:2-8; Attocube ANC350:1-8), which FXI did not, but vendor/firmware detail is still not in source. Families bound (MotionController), models named where evident (PMAC, Attocube), specifics blank. The MotionController Models and Drive identities.
ZEBRA-1 Nice-to-have Is nanoZebra (Zeb:3) the live trigger master, and is the PandABox (67-nano-panda, currently partly commented) the go-forward box? One live Zebra; PandA deferred. The TimingController set.
ENERGY-1 Nice-to-have Does an energy change co-move the zone-plate refocus per element edge, and is that table operator-data or a CORA Calibration? Energy axis drives the monochromator; the optic co-move is noted, not modelled. The energy-change Method shape.

Answering one of these

Every row above is a question about the real beamline, and any of them can be answered by someone who knows the hardware. You do not need to edit this page or know where it lives.

Open a short issue at github.com/xmap/cora/issues, quote the item ID, and write the answer in plain text. One answer is as welcome as several. If you do not use GitHub, send the same thing to whoever shared this page with you. If a row turns out to be a controls, network, or engineering question, pass it to the right person or tell us who that is.

The priorities mean: Blocks-build, your answer changes the structure of the description, so CORA cannot finalise it until you reply; Blocks-go-live, a guess is fine for the description, but the real value is needed before CORA controls or observes the hardware; Nice-to-have, extra detail for the record.

Once an item is confirmed we record the value and delete the row, so this page always shows only what is still open.